<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arbitrating Employment Disputes:  Misusing a Valuable Tool? Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://businessconflictmanagement.com/blog/2009/11/arbitrating-employment-disputes-misusing-a-valuable-tool-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://businessconflictmanagement.com/blog/2009/11/arbitrating-employment-disputes-misusing-a-valuable-tool-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Conflict Management Expertise from F. Peter Phillips</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philip J. Loree Jr.</title>
		<link>http://businessconflictmanagement.com/blog/2009/11/arbitrating-employment-disputes-misusing-a-valuable-tool-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1348</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip J. Loree Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessconflictmanagement.com/blog/?p=334#comment-1348</guid>
		<description>Michael, 

Thanks for the mention! 

I agree that those pushing the Arbitration Fairness Act are going to take the study or others like it very seriously.  

Peter, I applaud you for the unique perspective you have taken on this troublesome issue.  I may not entirely agree with your theory, but I believe it it is a very interesting and creative one.  And you may be right!  But whether you are or not, I appreciate intelligent, creative commentary on important issues, and you certainly provide that.  

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, </p>
<p>Thanks for the mention! </p>
<p>I agree that those pushing the Arbitration Fairness Act are going to take the study or others like it very seriously.  </p>
<p>Peter, I applaud you for the unique perspective you have taken on this troublesome issue.  I may not entirely agree with your theory, but I believe it it is a very interesting and creative one.  And you may be right!  But whether you are or not, I appreciate intelligent, creative commentary on important issues, and you certainly provide that.  </p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Carbone</title>
		<link>http://businessconflictmanagement.com/blog/2009/11/arbitrating-employment-disputes-misusing-a-valuable-tool-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Carbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessconflictmanagement.com/blog/?p=334#comment-727</guid>
		<description>Franchise disputes got included on the theory that franchisees, like consumers and employees, lack bargaining power and that arbitration clauses are foisted upon them as contracts of adhesion.

Phil Loree just called our attention to a study saying that consumers, or at least some of them, don't do all that bad in arbitration.  We should check it out, although I doubt that the members of Congress who are pushing the Arbitration Fairness Act would be interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franchise disputes got included on the theory that franchisees, like consumers and employees, lack bargaining power and that arbitration clauses are foisted upon them as contracts of adhesion.</p>
<p>Phil Loree just called our attention to a study saying that consumers, or at least some of them, don&#8217;t do all that bad in arbitration.  We should check it out, although I doubt that the members of Congress who are pushing the Arbitration Fairness Act would be interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

