Archive for June, 2010

Mediation Confidentiality Collides with Accountability in Court-Ordered Mediation

In the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, a judge held a hearing upon Order to Show Cause why Wells Fargo, which had been required to participate in a mediation, should not be sanctioned for the conduct of its counsel in that mediation.  The mediator testified, Wells Fargo’s counsel testified, and at least one other counsel for a participating party testified — all concerning Wells Fargo’s conduct during the mediation.  The court held that there had been a failure to mediate, held Wells Fargo in contempt of the mediation order, and sanctioned them. Read more »

Employment Arbitration: Supremes Deal a Blow to Clarity

Prima Paint teaches that the arbitration agreement nestled in a commercial contract has a legal validity of its own, and that once a court determines that the “nestled” agreement to arbitrate is enforceable, then the arbitrator and not the court shall determine the enforceability of the rest of the contract.

The interesting thing about the arbitration agreement in Rent-a-Car, West v. Jackson is that there wasn’t anything for the arbitration agreement to nestle into.  The document evidenced only an agreement to arbitrate.  Other terms of any commercial agreement between Jackson and his employer were set forth elsewhere.  This was just a “Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims.” 

So when Jackson was prompted to sue his employer for racial discrimination, the federal district court didn’t have an arbitration agreement to sever from the rest of the contract.  It had only the agreement to arbitrate itself, in all its lonely glory.

Which Jackson said was unconscionable because it was thrust upon him and unfairly limited his ability to vindicate his statutory rights.

And which provided that questions of unconscionability were to be decided by (guess who?) the arbitrator, not the court.  Take that, Prima Paint.

Read more »

ADR as a Human Rights Violation (??)

I had a good chuckle at an article that appears in the current issue of Dispute Resolution International, the journal of the Dispute Resolution Section of the International Bar Association.  Daniele Cutolo and Mark Alexander Shalaby discuss a case brought in Italy to test whether an Italian statute requiring mediation prior to certain consumer court proceedings violates Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, ensuring access to the courts.  The lower court found that it did.

Ya gotta smile.

Goofys Bewilder Read more »

Developments in Europe

Giuseppe de Palo and I first met in 1999 or 2000, when I was bowled over the first time I learned about his work with The ADR Center in Rome.  Since that time, every occasion I meet Giuseppe I am reminded what a powerhouse of talent, ambition, energy and aspiration he is.  Both his intellect and his physical energy make having a cup of coffee like saying hi to a tornado.  His recent e-mail proves no exception. Read more »

Next Page »