Archive for the 'Mediation' Category

Disputes Involving “Who You Are” Rather Than “What You Want”

In his keynote address to the Section of Dispute Resolution of the American Bar Association, MIT Professor Lawrence Susskind urged that it was time for ADR professionals to get involved in the failure of meaningful discourse in American public life, and to assist people to talk to each other about deeply held beliefs.  He focused on disputes that arise “when people describe who they are rather than what they want” and outlined an approach to dispute resolution that is distinct from the familiar Fisher/Ury interest-based model.

The underlying assumptions of interest-based facilitation — that the parties have interests, know their BATNAs, will seek maximum return without unnecessary delay, and will accept an agreement whose terms are better than no agreement – don’t work when people’s values, or their very identities, at at stake.  Abortion or same-sex marriage are not interests, or even principles; they define who some people are.  When these defining values are encroached upon or attacked, what facilitation model applies?  Read more »

Can You Recognize When You’re Being “Reality Tested”?

NOTE:  The following text will appear as a chapter in a mediator skills volume to be published soon by the International Bar Association, edited by mediator Patricia Barclay of Bonaccord Ecosse Limited, in Edinburgh, Scotland. 

    

          Reality testing is the technique of inviting a party to adjust his perceptions of the claim.  A party may overestimate the likelihood of success on the merits, or the other side’s ability or willingness to pay.  He may have an unrealistic assessment of his alternatives to settlement.  The transaction costs of continuing the dispute in court may not have been accurately addressed.  He may not have confronted business, competitive, or psychological obstacles to a successfully negotiated conclusion of the dispute.  The purpose of reality testing is to help to eliminate those obstacles. Read more »

Mediation Confidentiality Meets Attorney Malpractice

While working for a company, a guy opens up a competing business and lures away customers.  He is sued by his employer for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty.  Prior to trial he participates in a mediation, that is unsuccessful.  At trial he loses and is found liable for $364,000 in damages and $51,000 in attorney fees.

amazement

What does he do?  What any red-blooded American would do — he sues his attorney in federal court for shoddy representation during the mediation. Read more »

In March, Virginia is for [ADR] Lovers

Two interesting conferences will take place in Virginia during the month of March — one focusing on investor-state dispute prevention and the other on a variety of challenges and opportunities faced by Virginia mediators. Read more »

« Previous PageNext Page »